| No. | Document
Date | Case Name / Titile | Citation | Authority | Contents | Link |
| 1 | 14.01.2025 | Rajesh George | 16/2024 | Unknown | Commercial disagreements, do not fall under
anti-competitive practices | Download |
| 2 | 02.12.2024 | Gillette India Ltd. | W.P. NO. 33728/2024 | Madras High Court | Demand in excess of SCN is set aside | Download |
| 3 | 15.07.2024 | APN Sales | W.P.(C) 9536/2024 | Delhi High Court | Order Cannot Exceed SCN Scope | Download |
| 4 | 30.08.2024 | Adesh Jain | CRL. M.C.2824/2019 | Delhi High Court | Taxpayer cannot be kept in custody beyond the
period of sixty days | Download |
| 5 | 21.01.2025 | Pioneer co-op. | MAT/1983/2023 | Calcutta High Court | GSTR 9 Must be considered for ITC even if not
reflecting in GSTR 3B | Download |
| 6 | 11.02.2025 | Ismailbhai Hatubhai | 661/2025 | Gujarat High Court | Advocate not required to verify the genuineness of a power of
attorney which was handed over by a litigant to file a case. | Download |
| 7 | 14.06.2025 | Sicpa India vs UOI | SCC online Sikk-12 | Sikkim High Court | Claim of GST Refund of Unutilized ITC in case of closure of business | Download |